the ending of Stranger of Paradise put me in a mood. i haven't played many fine fantastic games, but a long time ago i decided i wanted to play through them all in order. you know like a stupid person would do. i got partway through 3 before i fell off. my obsession with chronology unfortunately extends to series with totally disconnected storylines
it also extends to games that have been re-released and remade a dozen times. this time around, like an even stupider person, i wanted to go for the original version of each game to really see the evolution over time, instead of just reading a wiki article about it. then like the possibly stupidest person, i wanted it to be the original original versions, as in the Japanese releases i have frequent trouble reading

i didn't last long here. i played enough to get it; to see the evolution i came for. i get that things used to be incredibly slow and tedious and buggy as all hell. it's the kind of game where i don't just need the manual open alongside it, i also need an article open to caution me on all the ways the game is broken. so many stats, spells and gear just do not work like they're supposed to, if at all
in ditching that, i'm back to my classic obsessing over which version of each game to play. when i played through FFI before i went for the PS1 version, which was a pretty good one from what i could tell. i've had the "Pixel Remaster" versions of I through VI downloaded, but i've been hesitant because they are PC versions of classic Final Fantasy games and therefore are likely to be terrible. i don't know what it is with Square and these games

this time around it's the font choices, and the weird omission of extra content from past versions of the games? the fonts are easily moddable so whatever, but it's something so blatantly bad that i can't help but think it indicative of the competence behind the whole package. but my small personal issue here (which doesn't affect FFI inidividually) is the unification of each games' visuals. they don't feel like the six different games they are, they feel like six campaigns of one game

it's a balance that's hard to define. a lot of what makes these remasters considered the definitive versions (by some) is the quality-of-life features, most of which are things that essentially admit the core gameplay is not fun. are these versions better because they're less time-consuming? also what's very funny is they later ported these versions to consoles with new features, which they didn't then update the PC versions with. as if they saw the "best" versions of older FFs were exclusive to PC and said oh no absolutely not

looks great

looks great